In short: A “safe injection” neither harms the recipient, exposes the health worker to any avoidable risk, nor result in waste that is dangerous to the community. We explain the risks in some more detail in this blog post.
This is the first in a series of blog posts on this topic. The follow-up post is entitled:
Have you thought about how a safe injection could be defined? Not easy, but the World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that reusing syringes leads to more than two million new infections, with diseases including Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) and hepatitis each year.
Use of the same syringe or needle to give injections to more than one person is driving the spread of a number of deadly infectious diseases worldwide.
Below we discuss some of the risks that make achieving safe injection practices a challenge, but nevertheless achievable by 2020, as the WHO suggests.
Prevalent high-risk practices
The WHO estimates that there are 16 billion injections administered every year. It also points out that around 5% of these injections are for immunizing children and adults. Another 5% are for other procedures, such as blood transfusions.
The remaining 90% of injections are given into muscle (intramuscular route) or skin (subcutaneous or intradermal route) to administer medicines.
According to the WHO, there are four prevalent unsafe, high-risk practices. One of these is unnecessary injections that could be replaced by oral medication, but we focus on the other three.
WHO wants exclusive use of the new “smart” syringes by 2020
|1. Re-use of syringe||In 2000, the WHO estimated that 40% of the 16 billion injections given (see above) were done with re-used injection equipment, leading to
– 21 million new Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) cases (32% of all new cases),
– 2 million new Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) cases (40% of all new cases), and around
– 260,000 Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) cases (5% of all new cases).
Other diseases that can also be transmitted through the re-use of injection equipment include viral haemorrhagic fevers, such as Ebola.
Bottom line: The WHO would like all countries to ensure only re-use prevention syringes (RUPs) are in use by 2020.
|2. Accidental needlestick injuries of health workers||Needlestick injuries are wounds caused by needles that accidentally puncture the skin. In 2003, the WHO produced data that showed there were 3 million accidental needlestick injuries (see WHO guideline on the use of safety-engineered syringes, p. 15).
We also need to better protect health workers against accidental needle injury and consequent exposure to infection.
The WHO recommends that safety devices that feature SIP (Sharps Prevention) and RUP (Re-Use Prevention). This would protect health workers from being injured accidentally by the needle and potentially exposed to an infection.
Bottom line: By safely retracting contaminated needles using a novel pneumatic technology, LomMedical helps reduce the risk for accidental injuries of health workers.
|3. Unsafe sharps management||For instance, a crown prosecutor who suffers from Type 1 Diabetes may use a syringe in court. Being in court all day may require that they adjust their insulin levels in a less-than-ideal environment. The challenge is where to put the used needle in the absence of a sharps container.
Unsafe handling of used syringes – also called unsafe sharps management – increases the risk for accidental injuries and exposure to a possible infection.
Bottom line: Sharp injury protection (SIP) is useful for patients and health professionals. Where SIP devices are introduced, nine fewer healthcare workers out of every 1000 are likely to suffer a needlestick injury in a one year period (see WHO guideline on the use of safety-engineered syringes, p. 10).
References used to put together the above Table
Hauri, Anja M., Armstrong, Gregory, L., & Hutin, Yvan J.F. (2004). Contaminated injections in health care settings. In Majid Ezzati, Alan D. Lopez, Anthony Rodgers and Christopher J.L. Murray (Eds.), Comparative Quantification of Health Risks. Global and Regional Burden of Disease Attribution to Selected Major Risk Factors. Volume 2, Chapter 22, pp. 1804-1850. Retrieved June 26, 2017 from http://www.who.int/publications/cra/chapters/volume2/1803-1850.pdf
No Author (2016). WHO guideline on the use of safety-engineered syringes for intramuscular, intradermal and subcutaneous injections in health care settings. Retrieved June 25, 2017 from http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/250144/1/9789241549820-eng.pdf?ua=1
In short, a safe injection does not:
- harm the recipient,
- expose the provider to any avoidable risks, or
- result in waste that is dangerous for the community.
Have your say – join the conversation
Source: What is a Safe Injection?
- Do you remember the last time you got an injection at your medical clinic?
- Did it ever hurt when the nurse removed the needle used to administer the required drug?
- Do you know of an incident where a health worker was injured by a needle?
- How does your friend keep used needles safe – diabetes, etc.?
Looking forward to your comments.